<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On lying, cherry-picking &amp; atheism &#8230; and a new word of the day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jmlynch.org/2009/06/29/on-lying-cherry-picking-atheism-and-a-new-word-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jmlynch.org/2009/06/29/on-lying-cherry-picking-atheism-and-a-new-word-of-the-day/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DLC</title>
		<link>http://blog.jmlynch.org/2009/06/29/on-lying-cherry-picking-atheism-and-a-new-word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-7087</link>
		<dc:creator>DLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmlynch.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/on-lying-cherry-picking-atheism-and-a-new-word-of-the-day/#comment-7087</guid>
		<description>So Lars: you using a microscope and a set of micromanipulators to split those hairs or were you just guessing and hoping it comes out right ? 
&quot;CMI Created a front company&quot; why then did they create a front company, if not for the purpose of deception ? 
See my comment previously regarding Lee Atwater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Lars: you using a microscope and a set of micromanipulators to split those hairs or were you just guessing and hoping it comes out right ?<br />
&#8220;CMI Created a front company&#8221; why then did they create a front company, if not for the purpose of deception ?<br />
See my comment previously regarding Lee Atwater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://blog.jmlynch.org/2009/06/29/on-lying-cherry-picking-atheism-and-a-new-word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-7061</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmlynch.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/on-lying-cherry-picking-atheism-and-a-new-word-of-the-day/#comment-7061</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;com⋅punc⋅tion
–noun
1. 	a feeling of uneasiness or anxiety of the conscience caused by regret for doing wrong or causing pain; contrition; remorse.
2. 	any uneasiness or hesitation about the rightness of an action.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;Compunction to be truthful&quot; doesn&#039;t really make sense. Should it be &quot;compunction for lying&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>com⋅punc⋅tion<br />
–noun<br />
1. 	a feeling of uneasiness or anxiety of the conscience caused by regret for doing wrong or causing pain; contrition; remorse.<br />
2. 	any uneasiness or hesitation about the rightness of an action.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Compunction to be truthful&#8221; doesn&#8217;t really make sense. Should it be &#8220;compunction for lying&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pieret</title>
		<link>http://blog.jmlynch.org/2009/06/29/on-lying-cherry-picking-atheism-and-a-new-word-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-7060</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pieret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmlynch.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/on-lying-cherry-picking-atheism-and-a-new-word-of-the-day/#comment-7060</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I am not an atheist. Just like John Wilkins, I am an agnostic.&lt;/i&gt;

It seems they have you covered, you agnostopath, you.

But I&#039;m confused. They claim that atheists (and, no doubt, agnostopaths) have &quot;no compunction to be truthful at all&quot; and then go on to cite Bible passages where, they claim, Jesus had no compunction to be truthful either.  

Is there a little disconnect here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I am not an atheist. Just like John Wilkins, I am an agnostic.</i></p>
<p>It seems they have you covered, you agnostopath, you.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m confused. They claim that atheists (and, no doubt, agnostopaths) have &#8220;no compunction to be truthful at all&#8221; and then go on to cite Bible passages where, they claim, Jesus had no compunction to be truthful either.  </p>
<p>Is there a little disconnect here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
