I can’t find where Dembski made the announcement, but I’m fairly sure that he neither stated which paper was accepted or to which journal.

It was in a passing comment on UD. I can’t remember when, but I’m sure the usual suspects will know and be able to point to where they mocked wMad for it.
I’m amazed that the whole of the Biologic Institute has only produced four papers in a year. I’d expect each one of the senior researchers (Gonzales, Axe, Sternberg) to be producing at least that number.

My experience is that one gets a vote from the reviewers much faster. And if they ask for additional data they won’t give you 1.5 additional years.

Data? C’mon, this is Bill Dembski. He don’t need no steenkin’ data!

Conservation of Information in Search: Measuring the Cost of Success. [posted 5jun07] Paper currently under review on the mathematical foundations of intelligent design coauthored with Robert J. Marks II. This paper develops a general method for critiquing inflated claims about the power of evolutionary computing

Active Information in Evolutionary Search. [posted 5jun07] Paper currently under review on the mathematical foundations of intelligent design coauthored with Robert J. Marks II. This paper critiques Olle Häggström’s 2007 article in Biology and Philosophy titled “Intelligent Design and the NFL Theorems.”

Unacknowledged Information Costs in Evolutionary Computing: A Case Study on the Evolution of Nucleotide Binding Sites. [posted 5jun07] Paper currently under review on the mathematical foundations of intelligent design coauthored with Robert J. Marks II. This paper critiques Thomas Schneider’s 2000 article in Nucleic Acids Research titled “Evolution of Biological Information.”

(embphasis mine)
Thus, today these three papers are “under review” for 578 days!
578 days!!!
My experience is that one gets a vote from the reviewers much faster. And if they ask for additional data they won’t give you 1.5 additional years.