Comments on: Bush Vetos HR 810

By: Sean

Sean — Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:02:12 +0000

The Editorial Board of the Los Angeles Times is also perplexed by President Bush's action.

By: mark

mark — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:06:24 +0000

How many homosexuals were in the adoring crowd surrounding Bush as he vetoed? How many Palestinians, Haitians, or Liberals? Hey, they all were once embryos, too. If only Bush cared as much for those already born as he does for the zygotes, blastocysts, and destined-for-the-dumpster clumps of cells that he “championed,” the world would be a much better place.

By: Lettuce

Lettuce — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:24:48 +0000

Do you think it matters, or will persuade anyone who is still persuadable, that you point out that a position taken by this President is a joke?
It hasn’t mattered in more than 20 years.
Ronald Reagan signed the California Therapuetic Abortion Act. Then he ran for President on the canard that human life begins at conception while excusing his position in signing the CTAA because abortion had become a lot more widespread than he expected since then.
He was, in essence, in favor of limited murder (using his own definitions and those of his most rabid followers.)
Somehow he managed to sell this.
They have never cared about reality and you can’t persuade them on the basis of it.

By: Hume's Ghost

Hume's Ghost — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:38:42 +0000

I suspect the President is incapable of understanding the logical error of genetic fallacy.

By: Bruce Thompson

Bruce Thompson — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:49:25 +0000

Stem cell research held the promise of helping so many people including the President.